Skip to content

Podcast season 3 · True Crime

Monster: DC Sniper

Monster · iHeartPodcasts and Tenderfoot TV

A victim-conscious chronological reconstruction that makes the scale and uncertainty of the Beltway sniper attacks understandable without turning the violence into spectacle.

LR score 92 · 1 published rating

At a glance

What you’re committing to

Work
Self-contained season 3
Release
Complete
Episodes
15 verified main-run episodes
Count scope
This is a verified main-run count, not an all-published feed total; bonus, update, trailer, and epilogue items may be excluded.
Facts reviewed
July 21, 2026
Editorial review
July 22, 2026

Listening Record verdict

Why we recommend it

Its sequence-first approach lets listeners follow the investigation as affected communities experienced it, while keeping the victims visible within a case often reduced to the perpetrators' names.

Best for: Listeners who want a comprehensive reconstruction of a major case with attention to victims, communities, and investigative chronology.

Not for: Listeners seeking a compact listen or wishing to avoid sustained accounts of mass violence and public fear.

Strengths

  • Clarifies a geographically dispersed case through careful chronology.
  • Keeps community impact alongside the investigative story.

Caveats

  • The extended reconstruction asks for a substantial emotional commitment because the attacks are revisited across many installments.

Sensitivity guidance: Contains sustained discussion of mass violence, murder, and trauma.

Editorial signals

Story, reporting, and tone

  • mass violence
  • Beltway sniper attacks
  • community trauma
  • chronological reconstruction
  • victim-centered
  • case history
  • sober
  • comprehensive
  • tense

Evidence

Sources and listening links

Your Listening Record

Save, rate, and review

Private organization stays private. Ratings and reviews appear here only after you deliberately publish them.

Sign in as a listener to save or queue this work privately.

Published by listeners

Ratings and reviews

No one has published a rating for this work yet.